header-logo header-logo

28 January 2026
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Conveyancing , Tax , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Pushback on tax adviser plans for conveyancers

Conveyancers have objected to Treasury plans to make them register as tax advisers, currently set out in the Finance Bill 2025-26

In a letter to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury last week, Dame Janet Paraskeva, chair of the Council for Licensed Conveyancers, wrote: ‘This step will duplicate regulatory effort and will increase the regulatory burden in an area where there is no significant issue in relation to compliance with tax law.’

Moreover, Paraskeva noted, registration as tax advisers ‘would have the perverse effect of creating the impression’ that conveyancers offer tax advice to their clients—something they are not permitted to do under their professional regulations.

Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Conveyancing , Tax , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll