header-logo header-logo

27 January 2021
Issue: 7918 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-detail

Pupils on the bench

Barrister pupils have been given a chance to hear commercial court advocacy from the perspective of the bench, in a judge-run initiative.

Mrs Justice Cockerill, head of the Commercial Court, set the scheme up with the help of Combar, listing staff and her clerk pulling together hearings and identifying any potential conflicts.

‘The bench is so long I can sit with a pupil on one side and my judicial assistant on the other, all properly socially distanced,’ Cockerill J said. She hopes some of the pupils will go on to apply to become judicial assistants, an opportunity also open to solicitors and academics.

During this week (25 January), a different pupil was able to attend each day of a live trial.

William Moody, 24, started his pupillage at Henderson Chambers last September. Apart from two online hearings, his day with Mr Justice Henshaw before Christmas was the first time he had been in court for a hearing.

‘It felt quite extravagant being elevated directly from pupillage to High Court judge,’ he says. ‘What jumped out at me was the truth in the saying that the judge can ‘see everything’ from the bench: every yawn, every stretch, every nervous glance - I could see it, and I am certain the judge could see it too. 

‘Pupillage has been especially challenging, given a large chunk of the training - around advocacy, client handling, working in a team - is nearly impossible to attain. Having the bench eye view and seeing legal teams interact in front of you was invaluable.’

University professor Eirik Bjorge, 37, is doing his pupillage at Brick Court Chambers. He had only participated in remote hearings before spending a day in court with Mr Justice Foxton.

‘I was extremely well looked after and particularly enjoyed the contract law discussions with the judge and his judicial assistant, who was, co-incidentally, a former student of mine,’ he says.

‘There is no doubt that, seeing things, down to the smallest practicalities, from the judge’s perspective, helps you to be a more effective advocate.’

Issue: 7918 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll