header-logo header-logo

08 December 2011 / David Greene , James Stanbury
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Pulling together

Early collaboration between experts & solicitors is welcome news, say James Stanbury & David Greene

The continuing development of the litigation process and costs, particularly with the Jackson changes in prospect, are driving solicitors closer to experts and to collaborating with them at an earlier stage of the litigation process. This is to be welcomed, but certainly is a change in habit for many litigators.

The role of experts in the litigation process has radically changed over the past 10 years. This changing scenario and the place of experts in the dispute resolution process was well recognised by Lord Woolf in his report. The result of his work was to establish professional standards for experts and the modern relationship with the court. Woolf sought to emphasise the independence of experts and made experts directly answerable to the court. He also introduced within this framework the single jointly appointed expert. It was as a result of his work that experts have been required to state specifically that they recognise their role in the litigation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll