header-logo header-logo

24 July 2019
Issue: 7850 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Publication times reduced for Bar misconduct

Barristers who break professional rules will have their misdeeds publicly available for less time, under new rules.

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) last week decided to reduce the length of publication time for misconduct findings, effective from 15 September 2019.

Findings that do not result in suspension or disbarment will be available for two years, as currently happens. Where suspension is for 12 months or less the finding will be available for five years plus the suspension period—half the current period of ten years.

If suspension is for longer than 12 months, the period will be ten years plus the suspension period. Currently, publication would be indefinite for both situations.

BSB director of professional conduct, Sara Jagger said: ‘It is essential that we put the needs of the public first, but we also need to ensure that we take into account t

Issue: 7850 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll