header-logo header-logo

Public law update: February 2026

243397

From sanctions to Windrush & national security: the latest human rights & judicial review cases, rounded up by the team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer

  • A recent flurry of cases on the scope of Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in differing contexts has helped to clarify its limits, as well as potentially extending its scope in the context of compensation schemes.
  • The Court of Appeal has reiterated the importance of constitutional balance and respecting the executive’s role on policy issues, both substantively and in considering remedies in judicial review.
  • The Supreme Court has provided guidance on the tricky concept of ‘other status’ as a potential ground for discrimination in Art 14, ECHR.

Article 6 under the spotlight

Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) guarantees the right to a fair trial, including certain procedural protections in the determination of ‘civil rights and obligations’.

In PJSC VTB Bank v HM Treasury [2025] EWHC 3359 (Admin), a Russian bank subject to sanctions by the UK challenged

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll