header-logo header-logo

03 July 2008 / Joe Middleton , Mark Henderson
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Features , Public , Employment
printer mail-detail

Public law update

HIghly skilled migrant programme
Expulsion

LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION
In a series of recent cases the courts have grappled with issues of legitimate expectation as they relate to people granted leave to live and work in the UK under the highly skilled migrant programme (HSMP). These migrants are by definition exceptionally well qualified and make a valuable contribution to the UK. Their problem has been that, having been encouraged to come here on a programme leading to settlement (permanent residence), the rules of the programme and their eligibility for employment were suddenly changed and they found themselves facing the prospect of having to leave the country.

AA and HSMP Forum
The first pair of cases arise from changes to the HSMP criteria in November 2006. These meant that many of those already on the programme who had expected to be able to settle in the UK in due course, suddenly became ineligible for any extension of leave. The appellants in AA (Pakistan) [2008] UKAIT 00003 (21 December 2007) had originally applied for HSMP status in reliance on Home Office guidance which said that: (i)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll