header-logo header-logo

01 August 2025 / Jasveer Randhawa
Issue: 8127 / Categories: Features , Public , Local authority , Judicial review
printer mail-detail

Public law update

226815
Jasveer Randhawa explores some of the recent themes to emerge in English public law
  • Courts are narrowing the circumstances in which the Gunning principles apply, signalling more leeway for public bodies to engage stakeholders without triggering formal consultation obligations.
  • Recent cases also highlight a spectrum of contractual arrangements intersecting with statutory duties.
  • Judges are embracing a flexible, consequence-focused approach to reasonableness, affirming the role of judicial review in scrutinising public decisions.

Public law is a fast moving and highly specialised area. In this article, I consider some recent trends and themes in English public law, focusing on three substantive areas: consultation, the intersection between public and private law, and rationality/reasonableness review.

Consultation

Consultation has long been a fertile ground of challenge in judicial review, but recent case law has re-examined when the Gunning principles (R v Brent London Borough Council ex p Gunning (1985) 84 LGR 168) apply—an area that was previously considered settled.

The Court of Appeal first tackled the issue in R (Secretary of State for Work and Pensions) v Eveleigh [2023] EWCA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll