header-logo header-logo

Public Interest Lawyers threatened with closure

19 August 2016
Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Public Interest Lawyers (PIL), whose legal aid contracts were pulled by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) on 2 August, is likely to close its offices at the end of the month.

LAA terminated the contract after a “thorough review of information provided by PIL” in relation to claims against the Ministry of Defence on behalf of Iraqi nationals. This followed an investigation by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) into the firm.

In a statement the LAA said it was clear that “contractual breaches” with LAA’s contract were proven and warranted investigation by the relevant authorities. The SRA has asked the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) to consider allegations against the firm.

Steve Hynes, director of Legal Action Group (LAG) says: “We would have preferred the SDT hearing to be held in public as justice should be seen to be done, but appreciate that there might be good reasons, such as client confidentiality, for it not to be.”

Hynes adds that the void left by the lack of hard facts in this matter has been filled with speculation and “a good few of assumptions being jumped to by some sections of the media”.

“The journalists and others rushing to condemn Phil Shiner and his firm, would be best advised to remain silent and let the disciplinary hearing run its course,” he says.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Arcangelo D’Apolito

Winckworth Sherwood—Arcangelo D’Apolito

Private wealth and tax offering boosted by dual qualified partner hire

Sackers—John Card

Sackers—John Card

Pensions firm announces hire in project management team

Myers & Co—Kerry Boyle

Myers & Co—Kerry Boyle

Staffordshire firm appoints head of commercial property

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll