header-logo header-logo

21 July 2023 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 8034 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Inquests
printer mail-detail

Public inquiries: front-line evidence

131074
Public inquiries are most effective when their scrutiny goes below the surface, writes Richard Scorer

In recent years, a number of high-profile public inquiries have investigated serious failings by corporate bodies. To take four examples, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) sat between 2014 and 2022 and investigated responses to child sexual abuse by institutions in England and Wales. The Manchester Arena bombing inquiry sat between 2019 and 2023 and investigated multiple failures by various agencies, including police and security services. The Grenfell Tower inquiry, which has investigated multiple failings by corporate bodies, has been sitting since 2017. The COVID-19 inquiry, chaired by Baroness Hallett, commenced work last year and recently began hearings into the political response to the pandemic.

Public inquiries like these have the potential to achieve real change by improving responses to adverse events in the future, but only if the evidence of what went wrong is properly uncovered and scrutinised. Corporate bodies will inevitably seek to rebut criticism and justify actions taken. Evidence will often be submitted to an inquiry in the form

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll