header-logo header-logo

12 March 2009 / Professor Susan Nash
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Public / Human rights: Human rights & wrongs

Susan Nash highlights some recent contentious cases considered by the European Court of Justice

Relying on Art 9 (right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion) the applicant in Mann Singh v France (App no 24479/07) complained that a regulation requiring him to appear bareheaded in a photograph on his driving licence amounted to an interference with the exercise of his right to freedom of religion.

No provision had been made in national law for separate treatment for members of the Sikh community, who are required to wear a turban at all times. The Conseil d'Etat took the view that the regulation, which was designed to reduce the risk of fraud or falsification of driving licences, was proportionate. The authorities responsible for public safety used identity photographs on driving licences to verify that the driver was authorised to drive the vehicle.

Although noting that the regulation amounted to an interference with a Convention right, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) was satisfied that it was prescribed by law and its aim was to protect public

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll