header-logo header-logo

02 July 2009
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Public baffled by privacy notices

Code of practice highlights best (and worst) practices in data privacy

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has called for an overhaul of privacy notices that leave consumers baffled by unnecessary legalese.
Consumer research by the ICO shows that half of consumers don’t understand what they’re signing up to when they fill in online and paper forms. The ICO launched a privacy notices code of practice in June to help organisations provide more user-friendly privacy and marketing notices.
Privacy notices are the oral or written statements that individuals are given when information is collected about them, and explains who is collecting the information, what is going to be done with it, and who it will be shared with. The privacy notice can go beyond this, for example, by explaining access rights and rights of complaint.

Tom Morrison, associate, Rollits, says: “In an attempt to comply with the law some organisations have lost sight of the primary purpose of a privacy notice; to enable individuals to ascertain how their personal information will be handled, rather than to tick a box saying that a section of the Data Protection Act 1998 has been complied with. 

“The effectiveness of a privacy notice is generally inversely proportionate to its length and complexity. As notices get more detailed the ability to get through to the key points becomes increasingly difficult, and it has reached the stage where individuals can no longer see at a glance how their information will be handled.

“This has been identified as a particular issue over recent years, which led the Article 29 Working Party, a group which co-ordinates the approach taken by information commissioners throughout Europe, to propose a code of practice. It is out of this that the UK’s information commissioner pushed for a code highlighting what he considers to be best—and worst—practice. 

“The code is no substitute for taking sound legal advice and has no legal effect in itself, but it is certainly a positive development and a tool which should have an impact on the approach organisations take to designing comprehensive but easy to understand privacy notices.”

Chris Graham, the former director general of the Advertising Standards Authority, took over from outgoing information commissioner, Richard Thomas, in June.

Issue: 7376 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll