header-logo header-logo

13 August 2013
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Protection for vulnerable

Lord Chief Justice confirms plans for specialist judges

A “core group” of specially trained judges will be used for cases involving “significantly vulnerable” witnesses or serious sex cases likely to last more than 10 days, the Lord Chief Justice has confirmed.

In a letter to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, Lord Judge said such cases would be tried by a judge selected, on a case-by-case basis, by the resident judge and approved by a presiding judge. A list of judges likely to be selected is to be drawn up at each Crown Court. The Judicial College will then provide bespoke training on how best to conduct trials involving vulnerable witnesses and how to manage multi-defendant trials.

Judge Rook QC, who sits at the Old Bailey, has agreed to mentor the selected judges, while an ongoing initiative by Judge Arbuthnot, the deputy chief magistrate, aims to ensure cases involving very young witnesses come to trial within 12 weeks.

In June, the Home Affairs Committee called for specific guidance and training for judges in child sexual exploitation cases, and highlighted the risk of multiple defendants cross-examining vulnerable witnesses.

Earlier this month, a CPS barrister sparked public outrage by referring to a 13 year-old girl as “predatory” and “sexually experienced” during the sentencing of her 41 year-old abuser. A recent child prostitution case where a witness was cross-examined by seven barristers over 12 days has also caused alarm.

Lord Judge rejected the call for specialist courts to be used where children are required to give evidence, as this would lead to longer waiting times and would be expensive to set up and run. 

Baroness Deech, chair of the Bar Standards Board (BSB), welcomed the announcement, adding that the new Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates, being introduced next month, would assess advocate’s ability to deal with vulnerable witnesses.

Issue: 7573 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll