header-logo header-logo

03 September 2013 / Neil Ward
Categories: Opinion , Human rights , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Protection matters

Non-therapeutic sterilisation makes history

“In my judgment it is overwhelmingly in DE’s best interests to have a vasectomy.” In making this conclusion Mrs Justice Eleanor King DBE brought to an end a lengthy, careful and above all compassionate judgment in which she made legal history by ordering that it was lawful for the Applicant NHS Trust to sterilise a male patient with a learning disability.

The patient, known as “DE”, is a 36-year-old man with an IQ of 40, equivalent to the mental age of a six- to nine-year-old child. He lives with his supportive parents whom the judge rightly praised for their commitment to “work tirelessly to give him the best possible quality of life”. He has a longstanding girlfriend who also has learning disabilities and in 2009 she became pregnant. Tests confirmed DE’s paternity which was a profound shock to the parents and shook the usually harmonious family environment. The parents took him to his GP to ask for a vasectomy to be performed. The GP in turn referred him to the Applicant Trust.

Neutrality & capacity

The Application was brought on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll