header-logo header-logo

Protecting whistleblowers as employers ignore concerns

21 March 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Charities , Whistleblowing
printer mail-detail
Calls to a legal helpline for whistleblowers are on the rise, with demand highest in the health and social work sectors

The legal charity Protect worked on 3,336 cases in 2024, up 10% on the previous year. All callers to Protect's legal advice line are connected with a legally qualified or legally experienced adviser, supervised by a qualified solicitor, who helps them think how best to raise their concern and guide them through the law. As well as telephone and email support, the charity provides online templates to support legal claims.

Overall, 41% of calls came from the public sector, 26% from the private sector and 21% from the charity sector.  

Just under a third (30%) of callers worked in health and social work, 13% in education and 7% in financial services.

Worryingly, at the time of their call to the helpline, more than two thirds (68%) said they faced victimisation or felt forced to resign. 40% had their concern ignored by their employer, and only one fifth (21%) said their employer was investigating their concern.

Moreover, the majority of calls came from people earning lower incomes although 6% earned £70,000-£90,000 and 7% earned more than £90,000.

Elizabeth Gardiner, chief executive, Protect, said: ‘More than half (51%) of callers to our whistleblowing Advice Line earn less than £30,000.

‘These are often workers in the charity or health and social work sectors raising safeguarding issues or concerns about patient safety.

‘Whistleblowers provide a gift of information to their employers. They are the eyes and ears on the frontline calling things out, identifying safety concerns, protecting the reputation and the bottom line. But whistleblowing is not easy. People who come forward—as witnesses or as victims—should be actively listened to. They need to be confident that action will be taken and they won’t be ignored.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll