header-logo header-logo

12 October 2012 / Jane Wolstenholme
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Protecting the pot

How safe are pensions in bankruptcy, asks Jane Wolstenholme

The rights of an individual under either an occupational pension scheme or a personal pension arrangement often constitute an individual’s most significant asset after his or her house. Where an individual is declared bankrupt, the trustee in bankruptcy (TIB) will be keen to realise all the individual’s assets, including any value in the pension scheme, in order to satisfy those debts. However, there are strong public policy arguments in favour of protecting pension rights even for an insolvent individual. This is to encourage retirement savings at a level sufficient to ensure that the individual will not be left destitute in old age, when unable to earn an income, and therefore be reliant on the state. Conversely, it is not in the interests of creditors to allow individuals to use pension arrangements to put their wealth out of the reach of those creditors. The competing public policy pressures in this area have therefore led to sometimes difficult shifts in the attitude of the courts and legislators on how to deal with pensions on bankruptcy.

The issue has been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll