header-logo header-logo

14 August 2019
Issue: 7853 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Protect our cohabitees, say lawyers

Increase in number of cohabiting families underscores need for reform

Family lawyers have called for the law to catch up with modern life after official figures revealed a big increase in cohabiting couple families.

According to Office for National Statistics figures released last week, the number of families in the UK rose 8% from 17.7m to 19.1m in the decade 2008 to 2018. During that time, however, the number of cohabiting couple families rose by 25.8%.

Despite the societal change, however, lawyers say many cohabitees still mistakenly believe the law will protect them if their relationship breaks down.

Neil Russell, family partner at Seddons, said: ‘There remains the biggest myth of all in the belief that there is a “common law spouse”. There is no such thing.

‘Entitlement to share in a home is not automatic for the non-owning party. Only strict property rights apply. There is no entitlement to maintenance, other than for children. No entitlement to automatically inherit on death or to share a pension.

‘Parliament needs to legislate and in the meantime people need to be informed of the potential dangers of not securing their position in the event of a relationship coming to an end on the break up or death of a party.’

Graeme Fraser, partner at OGR Stock Denton and chair of family lawyers group Resolution’s cohabitation committee, said: ‘These statistics should come as no surprise, with even the Prime Minister being in a cohabiting relationship.

‘The fact that the number of cohabiting families is rising so quickly underscores the need for urgent reform so that couples who have lived together for a period of time enjoy certain automatic rights, unless they chose to opt out.’

In 2007, the Law Commission, which advises the government on law reform, recommended a statutory scheme of financial relief on separation, but the recommendations were not brought forward by the government. In 2018, the government said it would consider proceeding with the proposals, but no further announcement has been made.

Cohabiting couples in Scotland can make limited claims against each other on death or when a relationship breaks down. Northern Ireland also grants cohabitees legal protection in some areas.

For more, see David Burrows' NLJ article, 'Till divorce do us part' (10 May 2019).

Issue: 7853 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll