header-logo header-logo

28 April 2021
Issue: 7930 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Proposed capacity reforms set dangerous precedent

Proposals to reform the Mental Health Act (MHA) make ‘arbitrary distinctions between patients who have capacity and those who lack capacity and those who are and are not in the criminal justice system’, the Law Society has warned.
Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said the proposals set ‘a dangerous precedent for different “classes” of people within the same system of mental health services’. Responding to the Department of Health and Social Care consultation, she called for more safeguards to ensure individuals have their autonomy respected and can access justice.

Boyce said: ‘There should be no difference between the right of a person with capacity and a patient who lacks capacity to access justice, nor should anyone detained under the MHA within the criminal justice system be denied access to justice on the same grounds as others detained under the MHA.’
Issue: 7930 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll