header-logo header-logo

Proposed boost to civil legal aid fees

26 March 2025
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Fees
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have welcomed a proposal to raise civil legal aid fees by 10%-42% but called for more.

The Ministry of Justice’s consultation, ‘Civil legal aid: towards a sustainable future’, closed last week. The £20m boost would be the first increase in civil legal aid in 30 years, despite a 96.8% rise in the consumer price index in that time.

The Bar Council’s response emphasises the technical complexity of housing and immigration law, and increased demands on practitioners arising from client vulnerability. It calls for counsel to be paid hourly rates rather than a fixed fee and for travel and waiting time, and highlights the contrast between the proposed fees and the rates the government pays when it instructs civil barristers in non-legal aid work.

It states: ‘It is not clear how the government paying half the rate for doing legal aid work than it does for doing non-legal aid work, encourages “the best and brightest” to do legal aid work.’

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘A significantly greater uplift is required to genuinely create sustainability and adequately address the complexity of immigration and housing work. 

‘We’re calling for regular independent fee reviews to ensure parity with broader market rates to attract and retain talented legal professionals into this vital work. This is a critical area where we believe the government should spend now to save future costs. 

‘Evidence shows that early legal support prevents problems escalating with increased costs to the taxpayer.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘Raising the rates is welcome, however the government admits this would still leave a quarter of housing legal aid providers unable to help people who desperately need advice.’ Atkinson said a 95% rise would be needed to restore legal aid fees to the 1996 levels in real terms. 

Issue: 8110 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll