header-logo header-logo

31 March 2021
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Costs
printer mail-detail

Proposals to increase court fees

The Ministry of Justice is consulting on proposals to raise court fees, to raise 'an extra £11m-£17m’

It proposes backdating increases by inflation to 2016, with 133 fees affected. Fees for judicial reviews and tribunals cases would not be affected.

Under the proposals, the fee to file for divorce would rise from £550 to £592, an application for parental order would rise from £215 to £232, and a hearing fee for a multi-track case would rise from £1,090 to £1,174.

The threshold for Help with Fees would rise from £1,085 to £1,165 for a single person’s monthly income before tax, from £1,245 to £1,335 for a couple, and from £245 to £265 for additional income per dependent child.

The consultation on ‘increasing selected court fees and Help with Fees income thresholds by inflation’ closes on 17 May.

Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll