header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
02 March 2007 / Tamsin Cox , Edward Peters KC
Issue: 7262 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Property law update

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Landlords' obligations under DDA 1995, Statutory protection of tenants, Adverse possession

DISCRIMINATING LANDLORDS

The Court of Appeal in Richmond Court (Swansea) Ltd v Williams [2006] EWCA Civ 1719. [2006] All ER (D) 218 (Dec) has provided welcome guidance about the test to be applied when considering whether a landlord has discriminated against a tenant on the basis of disability, contrary to the provisions of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995).

Dorothy Williams was the underlessee of a third floor flat. Her flat was reached by a common staircase, which her lease granted her an easement to use. However, at the age of 81 she was suffering from mobility problems. She could use the stairs only with the greatest difficulty, and needed a stairlift.

The local authority was prepared to pay for the installation of a stairlift, but the headlessee of the block refused to allow it to be installed. Williams claimed that, by refusing its consent, the headlessee was discriminating against her contrary to DDA 1995, s 22(3), and the judge allowed her claim.

Requirements of DDA 1995

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll