header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 July 2020 / Philip Sissons
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Property
printer mail-detail

Property law & the COVID-19 pandemic (Pt 2)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
25148
The use and occupation of property and performance of property contracts Phil Sissons

Introduction

Beyond the obligations of a tenant to continue to pay rent and service charges (see Pt 1, ‘Property law & the COVID-19 pandemic’, NLJ, 10 July 2020, p20) the lockdown restrictions give rise to a second major group of loosely related issues around the use and occupation of property.

Keep open covenants

Some commercial leases (particularly, for example, leases of retail units in a shopping centre) contain clauses which oblige the tenant to open for business, usually during specified hours. Can those clauses be enforced when the tenant ceases trading due to the pandemic? In most cases the answer seems clear. If the 2020 Regulations have compelled the closure of the business this would provide a defence to a claim for non-compliance with the covenant. (For more detailed treatment of the issue of keep open covenants see ‘(Still) open all hours? Tenants’ covenants to keep business premises open and to pay rent during the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Jonathan Karas QC and James Tipler

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll