header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 July 2020 / Philip Sissons
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Property
printer mail-detail

Property law & the COVID-19 pandemic (Pt 2)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
25148
The use and occupation of property and performance of property contracts Phil Sissons

Introduction

Beyond the obligations of a tenant to continue to pay rent and service charges (see Pt 1, ‘Property law & the COVID-19 pandemic’, NLJ, 10 July 2020, p20) the lockdown restrictions give rise to a second major group of loosely related issues around the use and occupation of property.

Keep open covenants

Some commercial leases (particularly, for example, leases of retail units in a shopping centre) contain clauses which oblige the tenant to open for business, usually during specified hours. Can those clauses be enforced when the tenant ceases trading due to the pandemic? In most cases the answer seems clear. If the 2020 Regulations have compelled the closure of the business this would provide a defence to a claim for non-compliance with the covenant. (For more detailed treatment of the issue of keep open covenants see ‘(Still) open all hours? Tenants’ covenants to keep business premises open and to pay rent during the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Jonathan Karas QC and James Tipler

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll