header-logo header-logo

05 March 2009 / Michael Walsh
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Features , Public , Property
printer mail-detail

Property: Ground offensive

Seeking possession under grounds 8, 10 & 11 for rent arrears. Michael Walsh explains

The three most common ways of seeking possession for rent arrears under an Assured shorthold tenancy (AST) are under the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988), Sch 2, grounds 8, 10 and 11. Each of these grounds is explained in the box below. However, before a landlord may start a claim seeking possession he must first serve on the tenant a notice under the HA 1988, s 8. This section is clear that the court will not entertain proceedings for possession unless a s 8 notice has been served on the tenant (s 8(1)(a)) or the court has dispensed with service (s 8(1)(b)). Landlords should, however, note that it is not possible to dispense with service of a notice where ground 8 is relied upon. Landlords should always plead grounds 8, 10 and 11 in the alternative in a claim for possession for rent arrears. In deciding whether to dispense with the s 8 notice when relying on grounds 10 and 11 the court will consider

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll