header-logo header-logo

05 March 2009 / Michael Walsh
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Features , Public , Property
printer mail-detail

Property: Ground offensive

Seeking possession under grounds 8, 10 & 11 for rent arrears. Michael Walsh explains

The three most common ways of seeking possession for rent arrears under an Assured shorthold tenancy (AST) are under the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988), Sch 2, grounds 8, 10 and 11. Each of these grounds is explained in the box below. However, before a landlord may start a claim seeking possession he must first serve on the tenant a notice under the HA 1988, s 8. This section is clear that the court will not entertain proceedings for possession unless a s 8 notice has been served on the tenant (s 8(1)(a)) or the court has dispensed with service (s 8(1)(b)). Landlords should, however, note that it is not possible to dispense with service of a notice where ground 8 is relied upon. Landlords should always plead grounds 8, 10 and 11 in the alternative in a claim for possession for rent arrears. In deciding whether to dispense with the s 8 notice when relying on grounds 10 and 11 the court will consider

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll