header-logo header-logo

Property Law Update

04 January 2007 / Mark Sefton
Issue: 7254 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Mark Sefton explains the reasons behind the current popularity of leasehold enfranchisement

Leasehold enfranchisement is big business these days. One reason for this is that, since the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 came into force, tenants no longer have to occupy the property as their residence to qualify to bring a claim. Developers can now buy a lease of a house or a flat and, so long as the conveyancing has been tied up neatly, they can claim the freehold or a 90-year lease extension, even though they have no intention of ever living in the property. Institutional investors with portfolios of rack rents in the residential market can do the same. It has even been possible, in one case, for the head lessee of a large mansion block in east London to claim statutory lease extensions on all 28 of the flats within the building—Maurice v Hollow-Ware Products Ltd [2005] 2 EGLR 71, [2005] EWHC 815 (Ch), [2005] All ER (D) 254 (Mar).

Financial magic

Another reason for the current popularity of leasehold enfranchisement, though, is the increasing awareness of the financial magic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll