header-logo header-logo

04 January 2007 / Mark Sefton
Issue: 7254 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Property Law Update

Mark Sefton explains the reasons behind the current popularity of leasehold enfranchisement

Leasehold enfranchisement is big business these days. One reason for this is that, since the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 came into force, tenants no longer have to occupy the property as their residence to qualify to bring a claim. Developers can now buy a lease of a house or a flat and, so long as the conveyancing has been tied up neatly, they can claim the freehold or a 90-year lease extension, even though they have no intention of ever living in the property. Institutional investors with portfolios of rack rents in the residential market can do the same. It has even been possible, in one case, for the head lessee of a large mansion block in east London to claim statutory lease extensions on all 28 of the flats within the building—Maurice v Hollow-Ware Products Ltd [2005] 2 EGLR 71, [2005] EWHC 815 (Ch), [2005] All ER (D) 254 (Mar).

Financial magic

Another reason for the current popularity of leasehold enfranchisement, though, is the increasing awareness of the financial magic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll