header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Propert Law Update

King v Udlaw Ltd (2008) Lands Tribunal >>
S v Floyd (The Equality and Human Rights Commission Intervening)

service charges

Many people choose to holiday in properties let to them on a long-term basis, whether a cottage in the hills or a chalet by the beach. What is the status of such properties in the various statutory regimes dealing with the regulation of tenancies of residential accommodation? In particular, how far do the restrictions relating to demands for service charges in ss 18 et seq of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985) apply?

The Lands Tribunal has recently considered this latter question in King & Ors v Udlaw Ltd (2008) Lands Tribunal LRX/186/2006, producing the first authoritative determination on the point. It held that the holiday bungalows it was considering fell outside the ambit of the statutory protection.

In King, the appellant tenants had long leases of holiday bungalows at a holiday park in Cornwall. Planning permission for the park required that it should be used for holiday purposes only, and not for the provision of permanent residential accommodation. The long leases contained a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll