header-logo header-logo

15 May 2017 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7746 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

Promises, promises…

nlj_7746_robins

In the first of three election countdown articles, Jon Robins reviews the Labour Party manifesto's commitments to justice

It has been said that Jeremy Corbyn, doughty champion of any number of unfashionable causes, ‘gets’ legal aid. At the end of 2015, when the then new Labour leader launched a comprehensive review of access to justice, the MP spoke of his grandfather, a solicitor in Ealing, who would act as a ‘poor man’s lawyer’ representing people charged with begging free of charge. 

The Islington North MP also damned as ‘utter nonsense’ the media myth of ‘fat cat lawyers raking it in through legal aid’ and dismissed Michael Gove’s wheeze of pro bono by City firms providing a substitute for a proper publicly funded system of legal advice. ‘Pro bono, charity and food banks are not the solution to inequality,’ Corbyn said. ‘If we want a rights-based society with equal access to justice, we have to pay for it.’

Tub-thumping rhetoric

In that spirit, Labour’s 43-page draft manifesto, as leaked last week, didn’t disappoint. It had the tub-thumping rhetoric you might expect if not much of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll