header-logo header-logo

Profit & loss

05 February 2015 / David Greene
Issue: 7639 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail
greene

With the hike in court fees the government will make money at the expense of justice, says David Greene

It’s that time of year again; the annual hike in court fees to achieve the oft-stated goal of making the courts pay for themselves or, as some may see it, making the less well-off pay for our civil justice process. This year, however, there is a difference. It lies deep in s 180 of the Anti-social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014. Civil court fees and crime may seem an odd mix but the Act is one of those modern legislative behemoths that is home to a disparate group of legislative hangers on. Much like the Consumer Rights Bill now on ping-pong from Commons to Lords.

Sea change

Section 180 marks a sea change in court fees because, contrary to established policy, it allows the Lord Chancellor to make a profit out of the fees charged for seeking the public court to resolve a dispute, or again as some might put it, securing access to justice.

The application of the section has allowed the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll