header-logo header-logo

29 April 2010
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Proceeds of crime

R v Modjiri [2010] EWCA Crim 829, [2010] All ER (D) 146 (Apr)

While s 79(3) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 was concerned with the valuation of property, it was not concerned with its realisation. It did not require the court to assume that a beneficial interest had to be sold separately as such.

The court had to proceed on the basis that the defendant could obtain an order under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 for the sale of the property as a whole, and that he would on sale receive his due proportion of the proceeds of sale. It followed that no discount suggested by the defendant in the instant case fell to be applied.

The possibility that the defendant would not obtain an order for sale of the property as a whole did not affect or diminish its market value, although the costs of obtaining the order might be relevant.

A property did not have a market value of nil because a beneficial owner might not readily be able to obtain an order for its sale in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll