header-logo header-logo

Proceed with caution on ABS, Bar warns

26 August 2009 / Elizabeth Davidson
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Bar Council has warned against a “Big Bang” approach when introducing Alternative Business Structures (ABS).

The Bar Council welcomed the extra competition ABS would provide but advised “caution”, in its response to the Legal Services Board’s (LSB) May 2009 discussion paper on ABS and the liberalisation of the legal services market in line with the Clementi Review: Wider Access, Better Value, Strong Protection.

The barristers’ professional body said it was “less optimistic” than the LSB about the possible consequences of introducing the changes and saw “risks as well as benefits”. In particular, it predicted “tension” between promoting competition and liberalising the market on the one hand and actually improving the ability of citizens to pursue legal remedies and defences on the other.

It advised an “incremental” approach to change, so that the licensing regime could learn from and adapt to changes as they occurred rather than “playing catch-up”. This would also ensure that the “public interest is properly protected”.

There was “no proper evidential basis” for the assumption that liberalisation would “automatically” further the objectives of the Legal Services Act 2007.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll