header-logo header-logo

15 November 2018 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Procedural nightmares

​Dominic Regan provides some answers to the civil procedure worries keeping you up at night

Every October, I visit six cities and deliver a lengthy annual review of civil procedure. This year, the same three concerns were raised at every venue. What follows are my answers to those questions.

How do I ensure that Pt 36 doesn’t trip me up?

It is astonishing to think that so far this year we have had over a dozen reported decisions on the measure, five from the Court of Appeal, and another High Court judgment is imminent.

First things first: one must abide by the requirements of the provision. The safest way to make a compliant offer is by using the court form of offer, the N242A. Use of the form is not mandatory, but the benefit is that it helpfully prompts the offeror as to what is required, such as a relevant period of at least 21 days. Do not seek to adjust the measures enshrined in the Rule.

The deadly trap within Pt 36 is that an offer, once made, stays made. It doesn’t lapse through the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll