header-logo header-logo

06 December 2018 / Vijay Ganapathy
Issue: 7820 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Problems on an industrial scale

Vijay Ganapathy considers how courts are tackling the issues associated with the treatment & costs of industrial diseases

  • New treatment options for mesothelioma sufferers.
  • Scope of vicarious liability.

The last few months have seen the courts determining some interesting issues relating to industrial disease. The Court of Appeal also considered whether to overturn a first instance decision on vicarious liability.

Immunotherapy

Starting with industrial disease, a topic currently attracting considerable attention in many asbestos disease cases is immunotherapy and how the costs of this relatively new treatment can be recovered by claimants.

Exposure to asbestos can cause mesothelioma which is a terminal cancer affecting the lining of the lungs. The choice of treatment for this condition has been quite limited so the possibility of undergoing immunotherapy has given many sufferers considerable hope.

Immunotherapy has been available for treatment of other types of cancer and recently, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) approved the use of two immunotherapy drugs for lung cancer patients. NICE are yet to provide similar approval for mesothelioma which means sufferers either have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll