header-logo header-logo

07 May 2019
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Probation reforms were ‘disastrous’

2013 reforms saw offenders supplied with tents upon leaving prison

Mismanaged reforms have left probation services ‘underfunded, fragile and lacking the confidence of courts’, MPs have said in a devastating critique.

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) warned Ministry of Justice reforms to probation services in 2013 had been rushed through ‘at breakneck speed’, in a report published last week, ‘Transforming rehabilitation: progress review’,

In some cases, offenders leaving prison with no fixed address were issued with tents. Support offered to offenders had not improved and reoffending rates had actually increased, the report found. Small charities were excluded as private-sector suppliers found it easier to work with large organisations.

Community Rehabilitation Companies, which were created in 2015 to manage low- and medium-risk offenders, were ‘too dependent on volumes of work which did not materialise and their exposure to payment by results worsened the subsequent financial pressure’. Subsequent attempts by ministers to stabilise the contracts and then to terminate them early cost the public purse an extra £467m.

‘Inexcusably, probation services have been left in a worse position than they were in before’ the reforms, the report concluded.

Bob Neill MP, chair of the Justice Committee, said the report ‘backs up the findings of our own inquiry that it is doubtful the government’s disastrous reforms can ever deliver an effective or viable probation service.

‘As well as laying bare the eyewatering cost of terminating contracts which should never have been entered into in the first place, the report also highlights the failure to improve support or reduce reoffending. This has a real human impact: more victims of crime and more wasted lives as offenders ricochet in and out of custody.

‘We are also seriously concerned about the decline in judge and magistrate confidence in community sentences―even though these sentences generally lead to better outcomes.’

O’Neill urged the government to review how probation services are delivered and set out ‘a new, clear strategy for the future’.

Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll