header-logo header-logo

24 January 2020
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Prized assets in a brave new (blockchain) world

14754
Cryptocurrencies under common law: are we there yet, asks Valya Georgieva
  • Cryptoassets can be regarded as a form of property and can be subject to long established legal principles.
  • Legislation and further fact-specific interpretation will be required as the use of cryptoassets continues developing.

Over the past few years, blockchain technology has become increasingly important to the global economy, with virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple slowly infiltrating our lives. As these disruptive technologies have evolved, so has the litigation they generate.

Many questions arise in the context of cryptocurrency litigation: how does legal title to a cryptocurrency pass; can cryptocurrencies be held on trust; what legal recourse or remedies exist if cryptocurrencies are exploited for unlawful purposes, what happens in the event of insolvency? All of these questions revolve primarily around establishing the legal status of cryptocurrencies in order to ascertain whether they could be subject to well-established legal principles.

In November 2019, the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce (UKJT), a government commissioned body comprising members of the legal profession, published a ‘Legal Statement on cryptoassets and smart contracts’.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll