header-logo header-logo

22 July 2010
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Privilege right upheld

Quinn ruling protects privileged information

Solicitors are not obliged to disclose privileged information to insurers in the absence of a claim or waiver, the Court of Appeal has held in an important case on disclosure.

In Quinn Direct Insurance v Law Society [2010] EWCA Civ 805, the appeal judges upheld the High Court’s decision that insurers could not access documents seized from a two-partner law firm during an intervention by the Solicitors Regulation Authority unless the client waived privilege.

The insurer, Quinn, wished to view the documents to assess whether it was obliged to indemnify the second partner of the firm. The Law Society argued the files were subject to legal privilege and could not be disclosed.

Nick Bird, partner at Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP, says: “Quinn argued that they were entitled to see the files because insurers of solicitors were part of the regulatory framework of solicitors in England and Wales.

“They also said that they were within a ‘circle of trust’ which entitled them to see confidential material but not to pass it on. The Court of Appeal rejected these arguments, so insurers will have greater difficulty in obtaining material to try and avoid cover in this situation.

“However, the court also said that this may now prevent solicitors from complying with their duties under the policy of insurance to disclose confidential information as part of the renewal and notification process. This may cause conflicts between the solicitor’s obligations under his insurance policy and the duty he has to his client.

“If the judgment is not appealed and remains the law then either some solicitors will have to revise their terms and conditions so that the client waives privilege for the purpose of notifying insurers, or insurance policies will have to be amended to prevent solicitors from being under any duty to disclose this material.”
 

Issue: 7427 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll