header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 February 2013
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Privilege—Legal professional privilege—Scope

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another [2013] UKSC 1, [2013] All ER (D) 146 (Jan)

Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger P, Lord Hope DP, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption and Lord Reed SCJJ, 23 January 2013 

Legal advice privilege does not extend to communications in connection with advice given by professional people other than lawyers, even where that advice constitutes legal advice which that professional person is qualified to give, such as tax advice by a specialist tax accountant.

Lord Pannick QC and Conrad McDonnell (instructed by PricewaterhouseCoopers Legal LLP) for the claimants. James Eadie QC and Patrick Goodall (instructed by Solicitor to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs) for the defendants.

In 2004, an international firm of chartered accountants (PwC) devised a marketed tax avoidance scheme (the scheme), which they disclosed to the Commissioners for Inland Revenue (HMRC). It implemented the scheme for the benefit of the group of companies of which the claimant companies formed part (the group). The inspector of taxes considered it necessary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
Test Article
"There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll