header-logo header-logo

17 July 2024
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Transport
printer mail-detail

Private taxi operators take on Uber

Uber has lost its case against private hire vehicle operators over contract terms, in a decision with major financial implications for both local authorities and taxi companies

The Court of Appeal handed down judgment this week, in DELTA Merseyside and Veezu holdings v Uber Britannia [2024] EWCA Civ 802, overturning a High Court ruling last July that operators must enter as principal into a contract with passengers.

Intervening in the High Court case, private hire operators warned passengers would have to pay VAT on journeys, potentially raising fares by 20%.

Both DELTA and Veezu use an app to manage bookings, acting as intermediary between driver and passenger. Drivers pay DELTA a fee, called a ‘settle’, for putting them in touch with a customer. Veezu also provides services for school runs and medical transportation.

Lord Justice Lewison, giving the main judgment, said: ‘A booking may not necessarily specify any journey; or even be made for a journey at all.

‘A vehicle may be booked simply to be on stand-by. It is thus plain (and indeed is now common ground) that the declaration made by the judge is inappropriate. It assumes that the booking is made by "the passenger", which is not necessarily the case, and it assumes that the contract is one "to provide the journey" which is also not necessarily the case.’

Layla Barke-Jones, dispute resolution partner at Aaron & Partners, representing Delta Taxis, said the decision was ‘a victory for the taxi industry and all those who depend on it.

‘This frequently includes the disabled, elderly and low-income households. This was a landmark case, the result of which could have had a terrible impact on the lives of so many people—not to mention the administrative burden for operators.’

The case does not affect London, where different taxi regulations apply.

Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Transport
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll