header-logo header-logo

16 July 2009
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Private schools fail public benefit test

Charities

Two out of five test case fee-charging schools have failed to fulfil the Charity Commission’s public benefit requirements.

Last October, the Commission selected five fee-charging schools, four religious charities and three care homes for its first public benefit assessments. This followed the enactment of the Charities Act 2006, which removed the legal presumption of public benefit in favour of charities in the fields of education, religion and poverty.

There is now an active duty on all charities to demonstrate that they fulfil the public benefit requirements.

The results of the assessments, announced this week, revealed that St Anselm’s School Trust, Highfield Priory School and Penylan House Jewish Retirement and Nursing Home failed to satisfy the Commission that the opportunity to benefit was not unreasonably restricted by a person’s ability to pay the fees charged.

The two schools were found to have failed because they did not provide sufficient bursary funding for pupils from poorer backgrounds.
One of three test case care homes also failed, while another care home was deemed to be acting outside its charitable objects.

The commission will now work with these charities over the next 12 months to look at how they might make the necessary changes.

Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll