header-logo header-logo

11 August 2014
Issue: 7560 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Private landlord checks condemned as “recipe for discrimination”

Critics have taken aim at a proposal to require private landlords to check their tenants’ immigration status—included in the legislative programme outlined in the Queen’s Speech. 

An Immigration Bill would introduce fines for landlords who fail to carry out the checks, and restrict the right of appeal against deportation to the most serious cases. 

However, the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants branded the proposals for private landlord checks “a recipe for discrimination” which would increase bureaucracy, raise the cost of rent as landlords turned to agents for help, and ask landlords to make judgments that “even UK Border Agency staff and police officers have got wrong repeatedly”.

The proposals could encourage landlords to discriminate against people with foreign-sounding names or place tenants at the mercy of rogue landlords, the charity warned.

Issue: 7560 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll