header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012 / Tom Morrison
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Private eye

istock_000010982433medium_4

Tom Morrison returns with his quarterly review of the world of information law

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has again made clear that it is not optional to encrypt personal data held on any portable storage device. Nevertheless, many businesses, charities and public sector organisations are either deliberately or unwittingly allowing the continued use of unencrypted devices. It would be a bit of a pun to say that encryption is key to data security, but it has for some time been clear that it is likely that you will be found to be in breach of principle seven of the Data Protection Act 1998 if you lose an unencrypted device containing personal data. Unfortunately, Greater Manchester Police (GMP) was reminded of that by finding itself on the wrong end of a £150,000 fine.

Based on the reported facts, it was a bit of a slam dunk for the ICO. A drugs squad detective took a memory stick home and kept it safe in his wallet. Sadly, his home was broken into and his wallet—along with the memory stick—was stolen. The memory stick contained details of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll