header-logo header-logo

28 February 2008 / Loraine Davenport
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Privacy matters

Most family cases are of no interest to anyone but the parties involved, says Loraine Davenport

There are stark anomalies in the family courts. In one of my cases my client was the mother in a contact application brought by a father whom she alleged had sexually abused their child. Findings were made against the father, which the father appealed. The case had been through five hearings in the county court. The mother was understandably protective of her child’s anonymity and was shocked to learn that the appeal hearing was open to the public. While reporting restrictions would, of course, prevent the parties being named, my client was concerned that there was potential for the general public to hear the details of her private trauma.

 

ANOMALIES

The press has a right to enter family proceedings courts but not the county courts. The higher courts are open so that when matters of law are appealed they are in open court.

The distinction is that the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 (SI 1991/1247), r 4.16(7) applies, which provides that “unless the Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll