header-logo header-logo

30 May 2014
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Privacy

R (on the application of Privacy International) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2014] EWHC 1475 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 83 (May)

The issue in the case concerned the powers and duties of the defendant Revenue and Customs Commissioners to disclose information about its export control functions to the claimant non-governmental organisation, Privacy International. The court ruled (inter alia) that there was no discrete or freestanding function of the Revenue to provide information to third parties. However, it was not exempt from disclosure under s 18(2) of the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 if and insofar as it met the test therein. Further, the Revenue’s margin of appreciation could not be uniformly categorised. In some circumstances it might be materially or even very substantially circumscribed, in other cases it might be relatively broad. The outcome might differ depending upon the status of the person seeking information and the type and nature of information sought. It might also be temporally contingent, in that a wide-ranging request for detailed information at the outset of an investigation might be much easier to refuse than a modest request made later

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll