header-logo header-logo

12 February 2025
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Prison terms for kidnap & blackmail

Judges have, for the first time, been issued with sentencing guidelines on blackmail, kidnap and false imprisonment.

The first guideline, published this week by the Sentencing Council, covers blackmail under the Theft Act 1968, which generally involves demands for money or other property coupled with threats to the victim.

The guideline recognises the psychological harm and distress caused. It suggests a range of four to ten years in custody for the most serious offences in terms of culpability and harm, such as repeated or prolonged conduct, sophisticated planning, use of violence and deliberate targeting of particularly vulnerable victims. A high-level community order may be imposed for the least serious offences, for example, where the property demanded would ‘represent a limited loss’ to the victim.

Under the second guideline, on the common law offences of kidnap or false imprisonment, individuals may receive a high-level community order for the least serious levels of offence, and up to 16 years’ custody where there is high culpability and the highest level of harm.

The guideline allows the courts to recognise that false imprisonment in particular often occurs within the context of domestic abuse.

Sentencing Council member Mrs Justice May said the offences ‘are personal in nature, can leave victims feeling distressed and violated, and are often committed in cases involving domestic abuse.

‘The new guidelines from the Sentencing Council will enable the courts to take a consistent approach to sentencing these offences and help them pass sentences that recognise the full extent of the devastating impact these crimes can have on victims’ lives.’

The Sentencing Council consulted on the draft guidelines last January, receiving a ‘broadly positive’ response. For both draft guidelines, about half of those responding felt the proposed sentence levels were about right.

The guidelines, which apply to adults, come into effect on 1 April.

Issue: 8104 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll