header-logo header-logo

22 January 2025
Issue: 8102 / Categories: Legal News , Privacy , Media , Damages
printer mail-detail

Prince Harry and Lord Watson ‘vindicated’ as settlement agreed

Media lawyers have expressed surprise and admiration at the apology and settlement secured by Prince Harry in his claim against News Group Newspapers.

News Group Newspapers accepted for the first time that unlawful activity had occurred at The Sun and agreed to pay ‘substantial damages’. It also accepted responsibility for hacking former Labour deputy leader Tom Watson’s phone and placing him under surveillance.  

The eight-week trial before Mr Justice Fancourt had been due to begin this week.

Kishan Pattni, media lawyer at Freeths, said: ‘This is a colossal victory for the Duke of Sussex, but settlement comes as a surprise to the media law world, because he had publicly indicated that he required the truth and wished to achieve a reckoning against News Group Newspapers at court.

‘Indeed, it was rumoured that he would stand as a witness in the eight-week trial in pursuit of accountability. However, while detailed and potentially embarrassing facts for News Group Newspapers will no longer be aired, the substantial damages and open apology, which is remarkably contrite, will serve as an admission of their historic wrongdoing and provide full vindication for the Duke of Sussex and Lord Watson in the eyes of the public.’ 

News Group Newspapers stated: ‘NGN offers a full and unequivocal apology to the Duke of Sussex for the serious intrusion by The Sun between 1996 and 2011 into his private life, including incidents of unlawful activities carried out by private investigators working for The Sun.

‘NGN also offers a full and unequivocal apology to the Duke of Sussex for the phone hacking, surveillance and misuse of private information by journalists and private investigators instructed by them at the News of the World.

‘NGN further apologises to the Duke for the impact on him of the extensive coverage and serious intrusion into his private life as well as the private life of Diana, Princess of Wales, his late mother, in particular during his younger years.’

Jon Oakley, partner and reputation protection lawyer at Simkins, said: ‘This settlement is a complete vindication for the Duke of Sussex.

‘It is the first time in this lengthy saga that News UK has admitted unlawful newsgathering at The Sun. The Sun’s apology is for conduct that spans a full 15 years, from when the Duke was still a young boy to when he was a grown man.

‘The statement read on behalf of The Sun in court indicates the strength of the Duke’s case, and rewards his determination for taking action against a hugely powerful media organisation.’

Issue: 8102 / Categories: Legal News , Privacy , Media , Damages
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll