header-logo header-logo

16 December 2010 / Nina Unthank
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The price of freedom

Nina Unthank reports on why & how military veterans lost their latest battle

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Ministry of Defence v AB & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1317, [2010] All ER (D) 252 (Nov) was handed down last month. Between 1952 and 1958, the British Government carried out 21 atmospheric nuclear tests of thermonuclear devices in the region of the Pacific Ocean.

Some involved fission bombs and some fusion bombs. Some were exploded high above the Pacific Ocean; others were exploded at or a little above ground level. All of them will have given rise to radioactive fallout and what is known as ‘the prompt radiation effect’. All three branches of the armed forces took part with some 22,000 servicemen being involved. A group of 1011 claimants comprising mainly former UK servicemen brought actions, claiming damages for the adverse consequences to their health which they alleged resulted from exposure to ionising radiation deriving from the tests. A group litigation order was made.

The parties agreed that there should be a preliminary hearing to decide limitation in 10 lead cases. The preliminary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll