header-logo header-logo

16 December 2010 / Nina Unthank
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The price of freedom

Nina Unthank reports on why & how military veterans lost their latest battle

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Ministry of Defence v AB & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1317, [2010] All ER (D) 252 (Nov) was handed down last month. Between 1952 and 1958, the British Government carried out 21 atmospheric nuclear tests of thermonuclear devices in the region of the Pacific Ocean.

Some involved fission bombs and some fusion bombs. Some were exploded high above the Pacific Ocean; others were exploded at or a little above ground level. All of them will have given rise to radioactive fallout and what is known as ‘the prompt radiation effect’. All three branches of the armed forces took part with some 22,000 servicemen being involved. A group of 1011 claimants comprising mainly former UK servicemen brought actions, claiming damages for the adverse consequences to their health which they alleged resulted from exposure to ionising radiation deriving from the tests. A group litigation order was made.

The parties agreed that there should be a preliminary hearing to decide limitation in 10 lead cases. The preliminary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll