header-logo header-logo

02 October 2014
Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Price fix

On an order for sale of property, is it appropriate that there be provision for the sale price to be determined by the party in favour of whom the order has been made or marketing estate agents instructed by that party or should provision be made for the court to have an input on the price in default of agreement?

This is a discretionary matter which falls to be decided on the circumstances of the case. Where, for example, the order for sale is based on a pre-existing right such as under a mortgage deed and there is a recognised rule governing the duty of the seller to fix the price, the order could follow the rule. In matrimonial proceedings and with an order for sale following a charging order (where the chargee’s debt is often minute compared to the value of the property), it is best practice to provide for recourse to the court in the event of disagreement. However, whatever the circumstances, the order suggested by the questioner is too imprecise as to the duty on the valuer.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll