header-logo header-logo

02 October 2014
Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Price fix

On an order for sale of property, is it appropriate that there be provision for the sale price to be determined by the party in favour of whom the order has been made or marketing estate agents instructed by that party or should provision be made for the court to have an input on the price in default of agreement?

This is a discretionary matter which falls to be decided on the circumstances of the case. Where, for example, the order for sale is based on a pre-existing right such as under a mortgage deed and there is a recognised rule governing the duty of the seller to fix the price, the order could follow the rule. In matrimonial proceedings and with an order for sale following a charging order (where the chargee’s debt is often minute compared to the value of the property), it is best practice to provide for recourse to the court in the event of disagreement. However, whatever the circumstances, the order suggested by the questioner is too imprecise as to the duty on the valuer.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
"There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
back-to-top-scroll