header-logo header-logo

13 January 2012 / Simon Blain
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Presence v residence

Are we edging towards a single, universally applicable, “test” of habitual residence? Simon Blain reports

“Where does my client live?” That is one of those apparently simple questions that family lawyers face on a regular basis, which turn out to have far from simple answers.

Three recent cases bring some welcome clarity to this fascinating area of the law, although we are still some way from having a single, universally applicable, “test” of habitual residence. The test remains different, depending on whether or not one is dealing with a European case to which Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (Brussels II Revised) applies.

Relevant factors

On a referral from the Court of Appeal the European Court of Justice (ECJ) was asked to clarify the appropriate test for determining the habitual residence of a child for the purposes of Arts 8 and 10 of Brussels II Revised (Mercredi v Chaffe [2010] EU ECJ C – 497/10).

The mother was born on the French Indian Ocean island of Réunion and is French. The father is British. The parents lived together in England as an unmarried couple.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll