header-logo header-logo

09 September 2016
Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Predictions for insurers

Cyber-terrorism, piracy, Brexit, the Insurance Act and the challenges of an ageing society are just some of the key issues for insurers in coming years, according to DAC Beachcroft’s latest annual report on market trends.

The in-depth report, Insurance Market Conditions & Trends 16/17, now in its tenth year, considers how insurers can prepare for the next decade.

It emphasises the need to focus on “critical uncertainties”, such as the impact of FinTech—the technological revolution currently underway in the financial services sector. Helen Faulkner, head of insurance at DAC Beachcroft, says these “tend to be broader, less clearly defined issues, but the ones that can have the most dramatic effects. The future of the global economy and technology fall into this category—the hardest to predict but with the greatest impact”.

On Brexit, the report notes that it is the dominant issue in the insurance market but should not overshadow other topics since there is little reason to expect a “bonfire of regulation immediately following Brexit”. Faulkner says: “One great trap [insurers] must avoid falling into is directing all their attention to the new critical certainty of Brexit upheaval and ignoring the longer-term critical uncertainties.”

The report makes 50 predictions. These include the impact of proportionate remedies under the Insurance Act, which partner Nick Young predicts will cause many practical issues. With insurers paying half of any compensation, costs and expenses following a commercial insured’s non-disclosure, Young says: “Insureds are likely to want far more involvement in choosing lawyers and handling negotiations.

“Issues may also arise where there are competing drivers causing opposing views, for example reputation concerns. Situations will need to be dealt with on a case by case basis and solicitors will need to ensure clear agreements and procedures are in place to manage any potential conflicts, while also ensuring any following market and reinsurers are in the loop.”

Young also predicts that claims for damages for late payment of insured losses will become common in policy coverage claims in 2017/18. “With the Enterprise Act provisions applying to policies incepted or renewed from 4 May 2017, claims under such policies are likely to be accompanied by demands for damages with little concern about the evidence in support,” he says.

“It will be relevant in every negotiation and mediation despite the Law Commission finding no evidence of systemic late payment. Until we receive judicial guidance on such claims, this risk is unlikely to go away.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll