header-logo header-logo

22 November 2019 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7865 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Predicting the (civil litigation) road ahead

11892
Significant changes are in the pipeline & lawyers need to be aware of what is planned. Dominic Regan puts down some markers

The civil reform process is not over. Intriguingly, the one reform that has attracted the most publicity seems unlikely to be implemented in the near future. The last government legislated for personal injury reforms designed to stifle lower value road traffic claims in particular. April 2020 was definitely going to be the date of implementation. Since fundamentals such as a new Protocol and precise Rules have yet to be addressed, April looks preposterous. As and when the reforms are implemented, the bottom will drop out of lower value claims which up to now have provided bread and butter work for solicitors and the Bar. Sir Rupert Jackson cut his teeth doing cases where the defendant failed to stop, steer or otherwise avoid a collision.

The major change coming is the extension of fixed costs. Everything up to £25,000 will be captured, as will the majority of claims worth from that figure up to £100,000. Detailed proposals were published at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll