header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
19 May 2023 / Sarah Jane Lenihan , Laura Couves
Issue: 8025 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Pre-nuptial agreements: signed, sealed, delivered?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
122339
Sarah Jane Lenihan & Laura Couves examine a recent High Court ruling which has reinforced the legal landscape of pre-nuptial agreements in England & Wales
  • Parties should continue to seek independent legal advice when negotiating pre-nuptial agreements to ensure they are freely entered into with full appreciation of their implications.
  • An agreement is likely to be upheld, provided there is nothing which means it should be varied or amended on the premise of fairness.

Mr Justice Moor in M v A [2023] EWHC 613 (Fam), [2023] All ER (D) 14 (Apr) has reinforced the legal status of pre-nuptial agreements in what was, arguably, the biggest challenge to the concept since 2010, where the Supreme Court set out the principles governing the agreements in the case of Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42, [2010] All ER (D) 186 (Oct). Radmacher established that such agreements should be upheld save for when they are unfair, either by virtue of how they were created, or the effect that they would have, if enforced.

In M v A,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll