header-logo header-logo

14 June 2012
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice—Summary judgment—Appeal

CXX v DXX [2012] EWHC 1535 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 22 (Jun)

 

Queen’s Bench Division, Spencer J, 1 Jun 2012

It is not automatically an abuse of process in civil proceedings to seek to show that a criminal conviction was wrong; all depends on the facts. 

Richard Davison (instructed by Bolt Burdon Kemp) for the claimant. Satinder Hunjan QC (instructed by Hutton’s) for the defendant.

The claimant was a medical secretary working at the hospital at which the defendant worked as a consultant physician. In 2007, they began a sexual relationship. The claimant became pregnant. She informed the defendant and he tried to persuade her to have an abortion. She alleged that on three occasions he administered or attempted to administer drugs to her in order to procure an abortion.

She alleged that that was done by placing the drugs into her drinks. The defendant was convicted of attempting to administer poison on two of the alleged occasions. He was refused permission to appeal against conviction by the Court of Appeal. The claimant brought a claim for damages for trespass

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll