header-logo header-logo

14 December 2012
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice & procedure

Joint Stock Company VTB Bank v Valerjevich [2012] All ER (D) 29 (Dec)

It was settled law that the question in respect of an application for interim relief under s 25 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 was whether it was expedient to grant the interim order sought. The question of whether it was a “good arguable case” was not a required test in an application under s 25 of the Act. The statutory test expressly provided how to approach such application, namely that the court could grant the order but might refuse it within s 25(2) of the Act. The court would however proceed with caution.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll